WebJul 18, 2012 · Originally Posted by jima4a /t/1420623/kef-q900-recommended-amplifier#post_22228314 So I continue to see people say they compared an XPA-3 or XPA-5 to a receiver and couldn't hear the difference and then conclude that all amps sound the same. I have not heard anyone say they compared a upper end Krell or other renouned … WebApr 15, 2014 · KEF Q900 Floorstanding Loudspeaker - Black Ash (Single) by KEF. Write a review. How customer reviews and ratings work See All Buying Options. Top positive review. All positive reviews › CS. 5.0 out of 5 stars Great bang for buck. Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on April 15, 2014 ...
KEF Speaker Review!! KEF Q750 Review! Are Cheaper KEFs a ... - YouTube
WebMay 25, 2011 · KEF Q900 Speaker System. Thomas J. Norton May 25, 2011. Performance. Build Quality. Value. Price: $4,250 (updated 3/10/15) At A Glance: Superb sound on both music and movies • Wide, deep … WebReview: The KEF Q900 floorstanding speakers look georgous, sound great, and have top-notch technology behind them. At $900 each and deals to be had, we highly recommend … udf thread_super_thread
KEF Q900 取扱説明書・レビュー記事 - トリセツ
WebMay 25, 2011 · Value. Price: $4,250 (updated 3/10/15) At A Glance: Superb sound on both music and movies • Wide, deep soundstage • Outstanding value. Cue the Qs. KEF’s Q Series, improved over multiple generations … WebTo be clear then, the Kef Q900 is a 2.5-way affair. Separation between treble and midband occurs at 1.800Hz. The vocal range is thus handled by the coaxial’s big surface. This extends unhindered into the bass where it parallels the dedicated woofer to, peu à peu, fade out mechanically not via a high-pass filter—there is none—but as it is ... WebApr 8, 2011 · Kef Q900 (£1200) Keith Howard Apr 8, 2011. It might look like more of the same, yet this Q series loudspeaker boasts some new features at front and back. The Q900 may be top of KEF’s brand, spanking new Q series – the meat and potatoes of its range – but to look at, inside and out, it appears in some ways to represent a step backwards ... udf-type-property