2024 Etepha v. director of patents

Etepha v. director of patents

Author: riyl

August undefined, 2024

WebThe Director of Patents aptly observes that it is "the common practice in the drug and pharmaceutical industries to 'fabricate' marks by using syllables or words suggestive of the ailments for which they are intended and adding thereto distinctive prefixes or suffixes". WebRelying on the doctrine enunciated in the Etepha case 7 and the earlier ruling in Lim Hoa vs. Director of Patents, 8 applicant-appellee contends that the DYNAFLEX mark would not confuse or deceive the buyers and subscribers of the DURAFLEX brand, because electrical wires are of great value and the purchasers thereof are generally intelligent ...

Las Opciones Reales Y La Simulación De Monte Carlo

WebThe Director of Patents ruled that the trademark ATUSSIN may be registered even though PERTUSSIN had been previously registered from the same office, hence, this appeal. ISSUE: Whether or not ATUSSIN … WebG.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent … lamplighter cambridge crossing

ETEPHA V DIRECTOR OR PATENTS.pdf - Course Hero

WebView ETEPHA V DIRECTOR OR PATENTS.pdf from LAW 101 at Philippine Christian University. EN BANC [G.R. No. L-20635. March 31, 1966.] ETEPHA, A.G. , petitioner, vs ... WebThe Director of Patents cites the following: "NUMOTOZINE" (Reg. No. 1990-S. renewed under Reg. No. 7461-R) for treatment of pneumonia, bronchitis, pleurisy. etc.; … WebSince the new constitution of Ethiopia enacted in 1995, Ethiopia's legal system consisted of federal law with bicameral legislature. The House of People's Representatives (HoPR) … lamplighter cleaners longmont co

Case Digest - Etepha vs. Director of Patents PDF - Scribd

ETEPHA v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS - Lawyerly

WebDIRECTOR OF PATENTS and WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., respondents. McClure, Salas and Gonzalez, for petitioner. Sycip, Salazar, Manalo, Luna and … WebDec 29, 1995 · [26] Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). [27] Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. [28] 224 SCRA 437 (1993). [29] Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. Director of Patents, 100 Phil. 214 (1956); American Wire & Cable Co. v. Director of Patents, 31 … helpful funling lamplighter hedge of thorns

"WebPerez, 154 Phil. 371 (1974) [Per J. Makasiar, First Division], Etepha, A.G. v. Director of Patents, 123 Phil. 329 (1966) [Per J. Sanchez, En· Banc]. 376 Phil. 628 ( 1999) [Per J. Pono, First Division], / Dissenting Opinion 3 G.R. Nos. 196372, 210224, 216104 & 219632 5 In the Middle Ages, the use of many kinds of marks on a variety of ... " - Etepha v. director of patents

Etepha v. director of patents

EN BANC G.R. No. 196372 GINEB.RA SAN MIGUEL, INC., …

WebCorp. v. Director of Patents". The Appellant also claims that the ruling of the Supreme Court in Ong Ai Cui v. Director ofPhilippine Patent Office" cited by the Director, far from ... CA,G.R. No. 114508, 19 Nov. 1999, citing Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966), Gabriel v. Perez, 55 SCRA406 (1974). Nestle v. New Zealand Page 3 of8 . http://www.onlineservices.ipophil.gov.ph/ipcaselibrary/ipcasepdf/AP_IPC_14-2006-000023_Decision.pdf

Did you know?

WebDirector of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks … WebSep 19, 2024 · ETEPHA v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS + DECISION 123 Phil. 329 SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent Office? …

WebEste articulo presenta los métodos actualmente disponibles para la evaluación de proyectos, dejando de manifiesto las falencias de los métodos tradicionales como el Método de Flujos de Caja Descontados, cuando son usados para evaluar proyectos con alta incertidumbre, donde además los administrativos cuentan con la flexibilidad suficiente … WebDirector of Patents, 95 Phil. 1, citing Nims, The Law of Unfair Competition and Trademarks, 4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 678-679). `The importance of this rule is emphasized by the increase of radio advertising in which we are deprived of help of our eyes and must depend entirely on the ear’ (Operators, Inc. v. Director of Patents, supra.)"

WebPatent in Ethiopia. Patent is a legal form of protection that provides a person or legal entity with exclusive rights to exclude others from making, using, or selling a concept or … WebMay 2, 1997 · In Masso Hermanos, S.A. vs. Director of Patents, 94 Phil. 136, 139 (1953), it was held that a dealer in shoes cannot register "Leather Shoes" as his trademark because that would be merely descriptive and it would be unjust to deprive other dealers in leather shoes of the right to use the same words with reference to their merchandise. No one ...

WebETEPHA VS. PATENTS SANCHEZ, J. G.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, …

WebFeb 1, 2024 · Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. [82] finds application in this case. In Etepha, we ruled that there is no confusing similarity between PERTUSSIN and ATUSSIN. The Court considered among other factors the aural differences between the two marks as follows: 5. As we take up Pertussin and Atussin once again, we cannot escape notice of … helpful fungiWebEtepha v. Director of Patents (G. No. L-20635) Issue: Whether or not petitioner’s trademark is registrable. Ruling: YES. That the word “tussin” figures as a component of both trademarks is nothing to wonder at. The Director of Patents aptly observes that it … helpful gameWebBrewery, Inc. v. Court of Appeals', Appellant contended that by apPlyir 9 the test of dominancy, the words L.A. and LA, assuming that they are the dominant ... the cases of Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. 9 (ATUSSIN v. PE TUSSIN), Mead Johnson & Co. v. N.V.J. van Dorp Ltd. 10 (ALASKA v. ALACTA) Cyanamid v. Director of Patents, et al. 11 helpful hands children center - columbus ohWebDec 29, 1995 · 26 Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). chanrobles virtual law library. 27 Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. chanrobles virtual law library. 28 224 SCRA 437 (1993). chanrobles virtual law library. 29 Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. lamplighter carmelWebEtepha v. Director of Patents .docx - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. helpfulgames/frenchWebView 34 Etepha v. Director of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks March 31, 1966 lamplighter hebrew academyWeb(Etepha v. Director of Patents, G.R. No. L‐20635, Mar. 31, 1966) S Development Corporation sued Shangrila Corporation for using the "S" logo and the tradename "Shangrila". The former claims that it was the first to register the logo and the tradename in the Philippines and that it had been using the same in its restaurant business. Shangrila ... helpful games sliding puzzle