WebIn Branzburg v. Hayes (1972), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that, although the First Amendment protects the professional activities of journalists, it does not grant them immunity from grand jury subpoenas seeking information relevant to a criminal or civil investigation. Such a privilege can be established only through legislation, the ... WebFeb 28, 2024 · In the court’s eventual Branzburg v. Hayes ruling, which dropped on June 29, 1972, the Supreme Court ruled against the reporters. In the majority opinion, Justice Byron White wrote that it...
II. Authority for and source of the right - The Reporters …
WebOct 29, 2012 · In the 5-4 Branzburg v. Hayes decision, the Supreme Court ruled against a reporter’s privilege to keep confidential sources anonymous, declaring that three … Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court invalidating the use of the First Amendment as a defense for reporters summoned to testify before a grand jury. The case was argued February 23, 1972, and decided June 29 of the same year. The reporters lost their case by … See more Paul Branzburg of The (Louisville) Courier-Journal, in the course of his reporting duties, witnessed people manufacturing and using hashish. He wrote two articles concerning drug use in Kentucky. The first featured … See more Persuading the Court to grant First Amendment protection to journalists regarding their sources was obviously going to be a hard sell. Notwithstanding the strong policy arguments in favor of establishing this privilege and the serious harm that would be … See more • Text of Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) See more In a fiercely-split decision, the Court ruled 5–4 against the existence of reportorial privilege in the Press Clause of the First Amendment. Writing for the majority, Justice Byron … See more Powell's opinion has been interpreted by several lower courts as an indication that reportorial privilege exists but was simply not warranted in … See more • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 408 • Free Flow of Information Act • Reporter's privilege See more chris mallalue
Branzburg v. Hayes - Wikipedia
WebBranzburg was subpoenaed to appear in front of a grand jury to provide witness to the illegal activity. Branzburg refused, citing his right to confidential sources. Companion Case When taking... WebBrief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, Branzburg (Petitioner), a newsman, alleges he has a First Amendment constitutional right to refuse to disclose in front of a grand jury, information he received from confidential sources. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Newsmen do not have a First Amendment constitutional right to refuse to testify in front of grand ... WebIn Branzburg v. Hayes (1972), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that, although the First Amendment protects the professional activities of journalists, it does not grant them immunity from grand jury subpoenas seeking information relevant to a criminal or civil investigation. Such a privilege can be… Read More geoffrey braswell